Only the male of the species is capable of rape. Since rape requires penetration and only males have penises (designed for penetration), thereby only males are able to rape females and other males.
The interesting thing about this recent revelation is that there is no word for a female forcing herself onto a male, a sort of forced envelopment or the more common “forced to penetrate”. Since the vagina is designed to envelope and massage.
There is no antonym for rape, meaning, there is no word or term that is the direct opposite of rape or the opposite action of rape. Since rape refers to forced penetration, whether of the vagina, the anus or the mouth. A penis or other phallic devices are required.
Is forced digital penetration considered rape?
The reason why I find this interesting is because the penis is direct opposite of the vagina. The world is balanced between the light and the dark, the off and the on, the hot and the cold. How can we expect to have a conversation about the male victims of female envelopment, if there is no word to capture this agregious and demeaning action?
Yet another example of how the world turns its attention from violent women and continues to target innocent men.
Perhaps “Milking” could be an appropriate term for forced envelopment.