What is a Sacrifice Without Blood?

A sacrifice isn’t worth much, unless blood is spilt. Take Adam and Eve for instance. Only after they “consumed” from the Tree of (carnal) Knowledge, did they realize they were naked. If you notice, they didn’t hide their mouths behind an animal skin, they hid their sex. So, whatever they “consumed” must’ve been quite deviant. Anyway, back to blood sacrifice.

In order to hide their sexual deviance from God, they killed an animal and used the HIDE from that animal to cover their recent dalliance from God. So a blood sacrifice simply means that blood must be spilt to HIDE or to satisfy the transgression that took place. Funny how words work, hide.

The blood sacrifice keeps the sin from getting out, since it remains hidden, but only if blood is spilt, does it remain hidden….or so we think.

If a man and a woman decide to have sex, they know, regardless of their willingness to acknowledge it, that the woman may become pregnant.

So, in the event the woman becomes pregnant, and she, nor the father want a child, then they will sacrifice the unborn, to hide their deed.

So, abortion is really about sacrificing the most pure and innocent to achieve something greater.

If you think about it, abortion is also akin to cannibalism. What other belief or ideology is focused and centered around the continual blood sacrifice of innocents, only to satisfy the hunger and greed of its believers?

Also, what happens to the baby parts? Who ingests the baby parts, only to attain the likeness of the baby, youthfulness and everlasting life? If you understand the vanity of humanity, then you can understand why so many chase virility and invincibility via stem cells and plastic surgery.

What else circles around blood and the everlasting properties of blood ingestion? Vampires, sexy vampires, who never die, but must continue to feast on the unknowing and innocent.

So, what have we learned?

Well, the constant desire to appear sexy and virile. The lust of youthfulness and the desperation of attaining popularity. All can be attained, as long as a blood sacrifice is made.

Or so we are led to believe…

As time marches on, the obvious remains, people never change, they just finagle new excuses and justifications in an attempt to HIDE their true intentions.

The female is the only half capable of being a virgin, and only a virgin can be considered virtuous, since only a virgin exercises restrain, to hold onto their virtue.

Since it is only a virgin, that hasn’t spilt blood.

If a woman becomes pregnant from a rape, then the blood of the baby must be spilt, the baby is sacrificed, for that woman to recapture her virtue.

God sacrificed his only son, to amend the transgressions and sins of man, Jesus’s blood was spilt, as a way to wash away the sins that are committed.

A blood sacrifice is meant to atone, yet time and time again the blood sacrifice of abortion is done due to greed and jealousy.


41 thoughts on “What is a Sacrifice Without Blood?

  1. Marleen

    It IS interesting how the word hide works. I will mention that Adam and Eve chose leaves. Someone who headed a church once told me the leaves they chose were of a scratchy sort. God is the one in the story who came along and said they needed animal skins.

    1. bottomlesscoffee007

      If you notice, Eve’s breasts are never covered, merely obscured. Whereas her pubic area is covered/protected.

      1. Marleen

        What do you mean by the breasts being obscured? It is a curiosity that the aprons/loin cloths (of leaves) did nothing about the upper body.

        1. bottomlesscoffee007

          The breasts are not covered, only obscured by surround vegetation or by Eve’s hair, but they are not covered as the pubic area is. Probably signifying the area that was “deflowered”. The vagina, the canal through which life is brought to earth.

              1. Marleen

                You know, an apron can cover the upper body too. Also, I’m thinking maybe they just sort of hid in some bushes and arranged or wove the leaves around them to hide or be under cover. (What can it mean when there were no clothes, yet, or tents or anything, to “sew” leaves?)

                  1. Anonymous

                    Of course, we don’t know a hundred percent. And we weren’t there, so didn’t witness anything firsthand, but I’m thinking we have various words that have been chosen in translation that lead us to think this or that… for instance, that they covered sexual parts. Maybe the point is mainly that they hid themselves (overall). Then the story says God came looking for them — asking where they were. See? I’m convincing myself, anyway.

                    1. bottomlesscoffee007

                      Yeah, I’m right there with you. Who knows, but the interesting thing is that we never change.

  2. Marleen

    As for vampires, who supposedly don’t die, it sounds like you’ve been listening to Alex Jones. I can’t get into such a subject. I do remember reading about strange Chinese delicacies. I had a chance to live in China for a while, some months or a year or so, but I just didn’t want to do so (overall, although I thought about it) at the time. I was going to be giving birth to my second son, and I did my want to be there. It turned out to be the year of the Tiananmen Square Massacre. This, of course, is a place that had the policy of allowing one child per family (now two).

    1. bottomlesscoffee007

      I’m not suggesting that vampires are real, more or less the base idea of a creature who attains immortality by feeding on the blood and seamen of unsuspecting persons. And how vampires are so closely related to sex and a sexual and sensual being.

      The humanity of the vampire is the pagan and human facets that create such an imaginary creature, it becomes understandable the vanity that we possess and the lengths we are willing to go to attain immortality or for a woman to appear virtuous (virgin) by staying young and fertile forever.

    2. bottomlesscoffee007

      The vampire is a cannibal, just as the mother who sacrifices her own child, for her own betterment.

      The mother, the cannibal and the vampire demand sacrifices be made, for their own gain.

  3. Why do we still cling to “chaste” as being the only definition of virtue? Why is it tied to a women’s sexuality?
    Cant a woman enjoy her sexuality and still be virtuous, “having or showing high moral standards”?

    1. bottomlesscoffee007

      No, no she can not Granny. That is why only virgin women are virtuous or a woman who saved herself for her husband remains virtuous.

      The reason why is because the more sex partners a woman has, ultimately is makes her birth canal dirty and impure. The purer the birth canal, the purer the woman, the purer the babies will be.

      Men are the protectors of women and men protect the woman’s virtue.

      If more men were true men, then women would not be suffering today from feminism. Feminism is the result of years of men not protecting and providing for their women. Fatherless homes, where girls grow up, into women, never knowing the value of a father and mother remaining together, for the family and for the children.

      This idea of women and men being equal in sex is rather new, maybe less than 60 years old. So for thousands of years, women were to remain pure until they were married.

      No culture celebrates a woman having multiple sex partners, until recently in the west. Any culture that promotes or encourages women to sleep around, ultimately always falls quite rapidly.

      Since sex is so primitive, a disciplined and responsible tribe would promote abstinence.

      Once sex becomes a pastime, it loses its place as a standard, it becomes a hobby instead of an act of love and devotion, between husband and wife.

      Like everything else throughout history, small spaces in time where a society might experiment (the sexual revolution) eventually the pendulum swings back to its original place, abandoning the notion that sex is something to be played with and not respected.

      If a woman feels she is not special and not worth protecting, then naturally she will seek out a protector the old fashioned way. Through her vagina.

      The more women hear that they are equal to men, the more women lose their value, since a man cannot bring life into this world, only a woman can.

      1. Yeah. I can’t agree with this. ‘Virtuous women’ is a product of religious nonsense. ‘Virginity’ is only one if several definitions of that word. Tying it to sexuality, only, is disingenuous. It also means ‘good or admirable quality’ which can equally apply to BOTH sexes.

        Sorry. Not following the religious stuff. In Pagan, Druid & Celtic times, women were equal warriors to the men. There was balance. Each had their own abilities.

        Love ya’, Coffee but, I strongly dissent.

        1. bottomlesscoffee007

          No worries Victoria.

          In the pagan, Druid and Celtic tribes, what was their stance on virginity?

          Who were equal mothers/caregivers in these societies?

          So, in the tribes where women were equal to men…how come these tribes no longer exist? Is it possible that their inability to recognize the difference between men and women led to their downfall and ultimate extinction?

          1. Here is a pretty good rundown on historic virtues in different cultures. Only two make reference to sexuality…and it ain’t the Earth cultures:

            They aren’t completely extinct, just quiet and low in numbers. How come the bulk of the tribes don’t exist anymore? Easy answer: Roman occupation/crusades…the rise of the power of the Church. Ancient Rome was as brutal as any Islamic tribe, today…convert or die.

            The data is far more complicated but, if you know nothing of pagan/celtic/druidic/wiccan culture, a concise answer is impossible. But, the short of it is, these Earthy cultures were a threat to the power of the Church (a key point being suppression of women). There is also an element to the Church’s power that would be even more difficult to explain without knowledge of the Chris Thomas material. There is a backstory to why it became SO powerful and able to get away with all the pedophilia.

            1. bottomlesscoffee007

              If these pagan tribes had the right answer when it came to the roles and relationships of men and women, then why did they lose?

              I would think that if they had a better method, they would remain the majority.

              1. That gets into Chris Thomas material. Let’s just say that the Vatican is guilty of using ‘energies’ that were not of this Universe. They made use of an unfair advantage, twisted the true teachings of Jesus, tried to wipe Magdalene out as his wife (whom was a Priestess and just as powerful as her husband, NOT a f****** prostitute), preyed on children, made women into servants or killed them as witches, hoarded gold, executed ‘heretics’, controlled the masses with lies… They are STILL lying.

                With those energies, Earth cultures went into hiding or were killed. Just because you have the biggest guns doesn’t automatically make you right…or righteous. It just makes you a bully.

                1. bottomlesscoffee007

                  Ok, then why did/would God abandon these people to be demolished by the Vatican?

                  I sometimes wonder…like the sale of Manhattan…how many sold out to enrich themselves…only later to have their descendants come back to claim the sale was fraudulent?

                  Like it or not, Manhattan was sold, regardless of how people felt about it then and how people may feel about it now. Whoever sold Manhattan, felt the profit was too good to not take in the moment.

                  1. Um…”God” hasn’t abandoned anyone. Our CREATOR (our souls) does not interfere with what is taking place in the Universe IT created.

                    Have you ever seen Constantine? The movie with Keanu Reeves? He has one of the best lines in cinematic history. Rachel Weisz’s character is talking about “God’s plan for everyone.” He rolls his eyes and replies “God’s a kid with an ant farm, lady. He isn’t planning anything.” The rest of the movie is biblical horses*** but, the line is SO true.

                    Again, Rome, the Vatican, the Catholic Church…used energies they shouldn’t have to consolidate & maintain power. Why do you think there is such a backlash against Christianity? Because the seat of power has done something so terrible that many of the souls involved will likely be banished from this Universe. Luckily, the errant energies released into this Universe were finally removed. When you remove someone’s freedom of choice, once that power is removed, there is a reckoning… What you are witnessing, now, is the pendulum swinging in such a manner that the patriarchy is the target, now. On a soul level, this is a HUGE uprising and balance reset. What is the primary race of the Vatican? PRIMARY RACE?

    2. bottomlesscoffee007

      If women weren’t meant to be virgins until they were married…then why a white wedding gown?

      White symbolizes purity, white will also show blood the easiest and most definable. The white wedding dress of today is the latest translation of white wedding sheets of old. The wedding sheets were examined after the wedding night to ensure the bride was truly a virgin.

      I believe women today joke about how certain women shouldn’t wear white on their wedding day, since they have already been deflowered.

          1. I dont agree with you but I respect your right to have your own opinion, especially on YOUR blog.
            I’m not going to change your opinion so there’s no use in going round and round like we did about abortion.
            Agree to disagree.

      1. Marleen

        I saw reporting, some years ago, on one of the anniversaries of the famous massacre in China. Western cameras showed up, and there were Chinese people out there in the square with umbrellas to hide their shame or the flow of information or something. Umbrellas are about as much a curiosity as fig leaves. Recently, I read an article wherein umbrellas and chairs were involved (the chairs as weapons), this was in Hong Kong.

  4. Marleen

    A woman can be a virgin and yet be infected by the very man she marries. In addition to the information below, there has been much news about men and the infection of girls/women with HIV. Consideration of these matters would be part of men protecting women. The more a male person “sleeps” around, but really any “sleeping” around, the more likely he will carry something that he will pass on to another person (no health barrier for being a wife).

    Gardasil 9 prevents infection by the same HPV types as Gardasil, plus HPV-31, HPV-33, HPV-45, HPV-52, and HPV-58. Collectively, these types are implicated in 90% of cervical cancers. …

    HPV vaccines are extremely effective at preventing infection by the HPV types they cover. Getting the HPV vaccine reduces a woman’s risk of cervical cancer and precancerous growths substantially. Men cannot develop cervical cancer, but the HPV vaccine may prevent genital warts, penile cancer, anal cancer, and the spread of HPV to sexual partners. …

    The HPV vaccine does not treat or cure an HPV infection in women or men who are already infected by one of these HPV types.

    Various strains of HPV spread through sexual contact and are associated with most cases of cervical cancer. Gardasil 9 is an HPV vaccine approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration and can be used for both girls and boys.

    This vaccine can prevent most cases of cervical cancer if given before a girl or woman is exposed to the virus. In addition, this vaccine can prevent vaginal and vulvar cancer in women, and can prevent genital warts and anal cancer in women and men.

    In theory, vaccinating boys against the types of HPV associated with cervical cancer might also help protect girls from the virus by possibly decreasing transmission. Certain types of HPV have also been linked to cancers in the mouth and throat, so the HPV vaccine likely offers some protection against these cancers, too.

        1. bottomlesscoffee007

          You’re right Marleen, men not acting like the protectors. Men and women compliment one another so well, that any deviation no matter how slight, proves devastating to both.

          It’s not men vs. women, it’s principled people vs people devoid of principles.

Please Like This Post, Follow and Comment to Aid in the Discussion

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.