Isn’t it funny how many people will go out of their way to protect an animal, and in the same breath support abortion? Have you ever known someone that reports animal abuse, yet will champion “a woman’s right to choose”?
If a dinosaur bone or ancient artifacts are discovered on your property, immediately the government steps in to protect and study the findings…yet, where are the same protections for an unborn child?
If a Bald Eagle nests on your property, you could be fined or even imprisoned if it is discovered that you disrupted it. Why don’t the same laws exist for babies in utero?
A woman’s right to choose, but not the same individual rights when it comes to private property?
You see, that is how I know that abortion rights are more about convenience and not about protection.
I’m not saying that we should not be good stewards of our environment.
I am asking, is a Bald Eagle is more valuable than a baby?
Are dinosaurs bones more valuable than a baby?
How can a person be appalled and disgusted with animal abuse, yet look the other way when a woman kills her unborn?
How can I support the 2A, yet view abortion as murder. Well, the minute I discharge my firearm in self defense, my gun will be confiscated and I will be placed under investigation as to why I felt the need to fire.
How can I be in support of the death penalty, and not be in favor of abortion? To be honest, I don’t know if I am in favor of the death penalty, but I will tell you this, a person awaiting the death penalty, goes under more adjudication (years of appeals) than a woman who gets an abortion.
If you’re old enough to have sex, then your old enough to birth a baby and raise a kid.
If you care about science, then you should respect the process of life, regardless of the stage.
If you define an unborn baby as a fetus, a zygote or simply a cluster of cells, then why would anyone mourn a miscarriage?